| Re: == Conversion SHP > PCX == - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
| == Conversion SHP > PCX == | Infraid | 00:50 24-07-2004 | ||
| Re: == Conversion SHP > PCX == | Olaf van der Spek | 09:27 24-07-2004 | ||
| Re: == Conversion SHP > PCX == | Infraid | 00:23 25-07-2004 | ||
| Re: == Conversion SHP > PCX == | Olaf van der Spek | 14:49 25-07-2004 | ||
| Re: == Conversion SHP > PCX == | Infraid | 04:04 26-07-2004 | ||
| Re: == Conversion SHP > PCX == | Olaf van der Spek | 10:25 26-07-2004 |
> > > But I notice smth : XCC Mixer tells me the SHP I wanted to convert, is in fact composed of 2 frames (obviously, the 2nd frame is void ?). Anyway, I remember having created thoses weird SHP using an old version of XCC Mixer. I may have just checked a wrong option at that time... 
> > Did you use -> PCX or -> PCX (single)?
> I'm sorry, I really can't remember...
> Is there supposed to be an issue with PCX or PCX (single) or are you just trying to locate a possible one ?
No, there's not.
> Coz it doesn't really matter now, since I no longer have PLENTY of cameos to refine (100+)... And now, when converting PCX > SHP, everythings fine.
> Again thanks for your help.
> BTW, I've announced at DeeZire.net version 1.36 of XCC Mixer is out. I hope you don't mind. 
Olaf van der Spek
| Home | Post | Users | Messages |