Re: Translation PHTML part without specs - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
Dutch.... | ReaprZero | 14:23 01-11-2001 | ||
Translation | Phoib | 21:23 07-11-2001 | ||
Re: Translation | ReaprZero | 05:42 08-11-2001 | ||
Re: Translation | Phoib | 05:54 08-11-2001 | ||
Re: Translation | ReaprZero | 11:30 08-11-2001 | ||
Re: Translation PHTML part without specs | Phoib | 21:22 15-11-2001 | ||
Re: Translation PHTML part without specs | ReaprZero | 01:18 18-11-2001 |
thanks :)
> Personally, I like PHTML more, because file-managing is easier, the number of predefined tags is greater, and the possibility to specify a complicated tag is better.
> What also is a great plus, is the ability to define tags yourself. As a added bonus, PHTML is cheaper.
> To be improved:
> supply with HTML documentation
> add HTML-validation
> PHTML: add META-tags
> Plus:
> PHTML: Many predefined tags
> PHTML: Ability to define your favorite tags yourself.
Home | Post | Users | Messages |