| Re: Alright, started, but still some questions: - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
| RA2 normals | Phoib | 21:01 14-11-2001 | ||
| Re: RA2 normals | ViPr | 22:16 14-11-2001 | ||
| Alright, started, but still some questions: | Phoib | 18:36 15-11-2001 | ||
| Re: Alright, started, but still some questions: | ViPr | 23:39 15-11-2001 | ||
| Re: Alright, started, but still some questions: | Phoib | 00:36 16-11-2001 | ||
| Re: Alright, started, but still some questions: | haydn | 01:32 20-11-2001 | ||
| Re: Alright, started, but still some questions: | Koen van de Sande | 04:05 24-11-2001 |
> isn't it TS normals that have 32 variations? RA2 normals
> are more complex (simply more variations, prehaps 256?)
> The think about RA2 normals is that we haven't decrypted
> them. Or am I missing the point?:rolleyes:
It appears to me TS has 36 variations :)
Please look in my other post about Auto-Normals for VXLSE.
| Home | Post | Users | Messages |