Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 04:08 24-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | ViPr | 04:52 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 07:16 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | ViPr | 07:49 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 17:15 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | will | 20:25 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 21:02 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | haydn | 21:19 25-11-2001 |
> The removing-redundant voxels first could be a problem though, some people might want to do auto-normals without loosing their 'internal' voxels. I could add that the redundancy-removal is performed on a seperate array, instead of the actual voxel, and copy the normals into the VoxelSection again later (thus keeping the redundant voxels). Thoughts?
Please make the removing of redundant voxels a seperate opperation because I like to use internal voxels to counter the problem of 'holes'.
> About the TOP/BOTTOM removal rule we discussed: that's all that's left to add (and the textfile mapping table).
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 22:57 25-11-2001 | 2 | |
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | haydn | 04:16 26-11-2001 |
Home | Post | Users | Messages |