Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? - XCC ForumRegister | Login | Search
History | Home | Messages

Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?Koen van de Sande04:08 24-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?ViPr04:52 25-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?Koen van de Sande07:16 25-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?ViPr07:49 25-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?Koen van de Sande17:15 25-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?will20:25 25-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?Koen van de Sande21:02 25-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?will01:20 26-11-2001
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?Koen van de Sande02:53 26-11-2001

> > Combined with the inside/outside flags, I now have 100% coverage :)
> > The removing-redundant voxels first could be a problem though, some people might want to do auto-normals without loosing their 'internal' voxels. I could add that the redundancy-removal is performed on a seperate array, instead of the actual voxel, and copy the normals into the VoxelSection again later (thus keeping the redundant voxels). Thoughts?

> in voxel_tools.pas, FindInside is a separate procedure. Just call that first (as removeRedundantVoxels does).

> > About the TOP/BOTTOM removal rule we discussed: that's all that's left to add (and the textfile mapping table).

Have you looked at my Jabber messages?


Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?will19:13 26-11-20012
    Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK?Koen van de Sande23:07 26-11-2001


Home | Post | Users | Messages