Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 04:08 24-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | ViPr | 04:52 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 07:16 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | ViPr | 07:49 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 17:15 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | will | 20:25 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 21:02 25-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | will | 01:20 26-11-2001 | ||
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 02:53 26-11-2001 |
> > Combined with the inside/outside flags, I now have 100% coverage :)
> > The removing-redundant voxels first could be a problem though, some people might want to do auto-normals without loosing their 'internal' voxels. I could add that the redundancy-removal is performed on a seperate array, instead of the actual voxel, and copy the normals into the VoxelSection again later (thus keeping the redundant voxels). Thoughts?
> in voxel_tools.pas, FindInside is a separate procedure. Just call that first (as removeRedundantVoxels does).
> > About the TOP/BOTTOM removal rule we discussed: that's all that's left to add (and the textfile mapping table).
Have you looked at my Jabber messages?
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | will | 19:13 26-11-2001 | 2 | |
Re: Auto-Normals screenshot - Is this OK? | Koen van de Sande | 23:07 26-11-2001 |
Home | Post | Users | Messages |