Re: progress check again - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
progress check again | ViPr | 12:42 21-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | flyby | 17:52 21-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 03:42 22-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Alon | 08:19 26-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 18:48 31-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Koen van de Sande | 20:34 31-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 22:53 31-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Koen van de Sande | 01:40 01-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Will | 21:29 01-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Olaf van der Spek | 01:39 02-04-2002 |
> My experience is that Delphi is slightly faster than VC++ (but comparable to Borland C++, which uses the same compiler anyway),
I thought VC++ uses an MS compiler and that an Intel compiler was also available.
> despite VC++ using the Intel compiler. Both are much faster than GCC.
> Delphi is easier than C++ to learn and use.
> Java can be fast enough, for example, use StringBuffer instead of String is usually a good idea if you are manipulating the strings alot.
Re: progress check again | Will | 18:15 02-04-2002 | 7 | |
Re: progress check again | MisterNutt | 02:15 17-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Will | 16:27 17-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | MisterNutt | 23:56 18-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Olaf van der Spek | 16:56 17-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 06:46 18-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | MisterNutt | 23:47 18-04-2002 |
Home | Post | Users | Messages |