Re: progress check again - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
progress check again | ViPr | 12:42 21-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | flyby | 17:52 21-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 03:42 22-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Alon | 08:19 26-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 18:48 31-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Koen van de Sande | 20:34 31-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 22:53 31-03-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Koen van de Sande | 01:40 01-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Will | 21:29 01-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Olaf van der Spek | 01:39 02-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Will | 18:15 02-04-2002 |
> > My experience is that Delphi is
> > slightly faster than VC++ (but
> > comparable to Borland C++, which
> > uses the same compiler anyway),
> I thought VC++ uses an MS compiler
> and that an Intel compiler was also
> available.
I thought that VC++ used the Intel
compiler, maybe badged Microsoft. But
I could be completely wrong.
I had heard that the Intel compiler
was massively fast compared to other
C++ compilers of the x86 architecture
(as long as you are using a genuine
Intel chip).
But I am really amazed at the speed
of the Borland compiler. And I like
the IDE much more than messing with
message maps and so on.
Re: progress check again | MisterNutt | 02:15 17-04-2002 | 6 | |
Re: progress check again | Will | 16:27 17-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | MisterNutt | 23:56 18-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | Olaf van der Spek | 16:56 17-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | ViPr | 06:46 18-04-2002 | ||
Re: progress check again | MisterNutt | 23:47 18-04-2002 |
Home | Post | Users | Messages |