Re: my impression of Renegade - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 07:06 27-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | Zoop | 18:03 27-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 21:07 27-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 05:09 28-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | Olaf van der Spek | 18:46 28-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 00:03 29-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | Olaf van der Spek | 03:32 29-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 04:53 29-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | Olaf van der Spek | 05:25 29-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 06:10 29-04-2002 |
> > > > > > ok i found out why so many servers have just the pathetic 4 or 2 player maximums. it's because renegade automatically sets this according to some other setting which i cannot find which has to do with bandwidth. has anyone figured out where that setting is? i have DSL so i should be able to host games very well and yet it won't give me more than 4 players max.
> > > > > What's the upload and download bandwidth of your DSL?
> > > > i think it's supposed to be a 384 kilobit per second DSL but the highest i've seen it download at was like 42 kilobytes per second.
> > > 384 / 8 = 48, so that's no surprise.
> > > And that's probably not enough to host a > 4 player game.
> > 4 players is ridiculous. i'm not playing 4 player games. why don't they let us decide how many players we want? the connection rate is not the only important factor.
> Because then all those players complain about slow and laggy connections.
i think distance is more important than the data rate.
Re: my impression of Renegade | Olaf van der Spek | 16:37 29-04-2002 | 3 | |
Re: my impression of Renegade | ViPr | 22:54 29-04-2002 | ||
Re: my impression of Renegade | Olaf van der Spek | 02:02 30-04-2002 |
Home | Post | Users | Messages |