Re: to be or not to be... - XCC ForumRegister | Login | Search
History | Home | Messages
to be or not to be...flyby07:05 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek17:35 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will17:52 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Godwin18:23 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will18:29 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:07 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will19:10 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:30 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will19:32 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero20:44 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby20:59 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will21:26 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby21:44 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek22:43 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby22:51 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will23:46 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby00:09 20-11-2001

> I think -1 (or 255: depends if you have a signed byte) is
> for 'no normal'. IIRC, look at the cockpit of that
> non-nod bomber (can't even remember side names and plane
> names now!).

You have a good memory, Will :)
I've found the index 255, but it seems only be used very occasionally...
Meanwhile,I've finished my shiny new cube voxel, TS style..

Home | Post | Users | Messages