Re: to be or not to be... - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
to be or not to be... | flyby | 07:05 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 17:35 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 17:52 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Godwin | 18:23 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 18:29 19-11-2001 |
> > What we did was take a copy of the APC from TS and
> > change the normals flag to '4' (it is the last byte of
> > the file, making it easy to find in a hex editor).
> yea, i think that's it, i made the BMP-1 from a rhino
> whcih uses the TS normals, whereas the cube was i think
> the apoc or something which i cleared and made it
with a hex editor (this method only works if the voxel has
only ONE section!).
there might be a way to edit this header in Koen's voxel
section editor? Or with XCC?
> btw, is the 2 or 4 changable?
> it'll be helpful for using the TS perfect normals on a
> previously RA2 normalised vxl
Exactly the point- there is nothing particularly wrong
with TS normals- they are more than detailed enough for
most uses. We don't need to understand RA2 normals,
because TS ones will suffice?
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 18:34 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:07 19-11-2001 | 18 | |
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:10 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:30 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:32 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 20:27 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 20:44 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 20:59 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 21:26 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 21:44 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 22:43 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 22:51 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 23:46 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 00:09 20-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 07:07 20-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Godwin | 18:37 21-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Koen van de Sande | 04:11 22-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | haydn | 00:33 24-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 19:00 20-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 20:43 19-11-2001 |
Home | Post | Users | Messages |