Re: to be or not to be... - XCC ForumRegister | Login | Search
History | Home | Messages

to be or not to be...flyby07:05 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek17:35 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will17:52 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Godwin18:23 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will18:29 19-11-2001

> > What we did was take a copy of the APC from TS and
> > change the normals flag to '4' (it is the last byte of
> > the file, making it easy to find in a hex editor).

> yea, i think that's it, i made the BMP-1 from a rhino
> whcih uses the TS normals, whereas the cube was i think
> the apoc or something which i cleared and made it

with a hex editor (this method only works if the voxel has
only ONE section!).

there might be a way to edit this header in Koen's voxel
section editor? Or with XCC?

> btw, is the 2 or 4 changable?
> it'll be helpful for using the TS perfect normals on a
> previously RA2 normalised vxl

Exactly the point- there is nothing particularly wrong
with TS normals- they are more than detailed enough for
most uses. We don't need to understand RA2 normals,
because TS ones will suffice?


Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek18:34 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:07 19-11-200118
    Re: to be or not to be...will19:10 19-11-2001
        Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:30 19-11-2001
            Re: to be or not to be...will19:32 19-11-2001
                Re: to be or not to be...flyby20:27 19-11-2001
                Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero20:44 19-11-2001
                    Re: to be or not to be...flyby20:59 19-11-2001
                        Re: to be or not to be...will21:26 19-11-2001
                            Re: to be or not to be...flyby21:44 19-11-2001
                                Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek22:43 19-11-2001
                                    Re: to be or not to be...flyby22:51 19-11-2001
                                        Re: to be or not to be...will23:46 19-11-2001
                                            Re: to be or not to be...flyby00:09 20-11-2001
                                            Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero07:07 20-11-2001
                                                Re: to be or not to be...Godwin18:37 21-11-2001
                                                Re: to be or not to be...Koen van de Sande04:11 22-11-2001
                                            Re: to be or not to be...haydn00:33 24-11-2001
                                        Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek19:00 20-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero20:43 19-11-2001


Home | Post | Users | Messages