| Re: to be or not to be... - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
| to be or not to be... | flyby | 07:05 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 17:35 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | will | 17:52 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | Godwin | 18:23 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | will | 18:29 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:07 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:10 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:30 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:32 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 20:44 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 20:59 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | will | 21:26 19-11-2001 |
so we are generally agreed? TS tackled and working first,
then RA2 normals?
good. time to get on with actually decoding them then
| Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 21:44 19-11-2001 | 10 | |
| Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 22:43 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 22:51 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | will | 23:46 19-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 00:09 20-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 07:07 20-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | Godwin | 18:37 21-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | Koen van de Sande | 04:11 22-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | haydn | 00:33 24-11-2001 | ||
| Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 19:00 20-11-2001 |
| Home | Post | Users | Messages |