Re: to be or not to be... - XCC ForumRegister | Login | Search
History | Home | Messages

to be or not to be...flyby07:05 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek17:35 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will17:52 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Godwin18:23 19-11-2001

> What we did was take a copy of the APC from TS and change the normals flag to '4' (it is the last byte of the file, making it easy to find in a hex editor).

> Then flyby put both TS and RA2 voxel versions into the game and got them side by side.

> A few screenshots would be nice, flyby :)

> To make this experiment meaningful, maybe more people should try it, and with other voxels?

so maybe why my cube test failed is because i used a vxl with the header of 4?
yea, i think that's it, i made the BMP-1 from a rhino whcih uses the TS normals, whereas the cube was i think the apoc or something which i cleared and made it

btw, is the 2 or 4 changable?
it'll be helpful for using the TS perfect normals on a previously RA2 normalised vxl


Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek18:26 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will18:29 19-11-200121
    Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek18:34 19-11-2001
    Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:07 19-11-2001
        Re: to be or not to be...will19:10 19-11-2001
            Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:30 19-11-2001
                Re: to be or not to be...will19:32 19-11-2001
                    Re: to be or not to be...flyby20:27 19-11-2001
                    Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero20:44 19-11-2001
                        Re: to be or not to be...flyby20:59 19-11-2001
                            Re: to be or not to be...will21:26 19-11-2001
                                Re: to be or not to be...flyby21:44 19-11-2001
                                    Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek22:43 19-11-2001
                                        Re: to be or not to be...flyby22:51 19-11-2001
                                            Re: to be or not to be...will23:46 19-11-2001
                                                Re: to be or not to be...flyby00:09 20-11-2001
                                                Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero07:07 20-11-2001
                                                    Re: to be or not to be...Godwin18:37 21-11-2001
                                                    Re: to be or not to be...Koen van de Sande04:11 22-11-2001
                                                Re: to be or not to be...haydn00:33 24-11-2001
                                            Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek19:00 20-11-2001
    Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero20:43 19-11-2001


Home | Post | Users | Messages