Re: to be or not to be... - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
to be or not to be... | flyby | 07:05 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 17:35 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 17:52 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Godwin | 18:23 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 18:29 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:07 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:10 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:30 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:32 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 20:44 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 20:59 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 21:26 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 21:44 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 22:43 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 22:51 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 19:00 20-11-2001 |
> > Make that 37. -1 is used sometimes.
> I haven't tested all TS voxels.
> You happen to know if it was an actual TS voxel (made by WW), or is it something that has been discovered while modding/fiddling around?
WS VXL.
Home | Post | Users | Messages |