Re: to be or not to be... - XCC ForumRegister | Login | Search
History | Home | Messages
to be or not to be...flyby07:05 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek17:35 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will17:52 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Godwin18:23 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will18:29 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:07 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will19:10 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby19:30 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will19:32 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero20:44 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby20:59 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will21:26 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby21:44 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Olaf van der Spek22:43 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...flyby22:51 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...will23:46 19-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...ReaprZero07:07 20-11-2001
Re: to be or not to be...Koen van de Sande04:11 22-11-2001

> IIRC?
How can you not know? :D
> > > > Make that 37. -1 is used sometimes.

> > > I haven't tested all TS voxels.


> > > You happen to know if it was an actual TS voxel (made by
> > > WW), or is it something that has been discovered while
> > > modding/fiddling around?

> > I think -1 (or 255: depends if you have a signed byte) is
> > for 'no normal'. IIRC, look at the cockpit of that
> > non-nod bomber (can't even remember side names and plane
> > names now!).

Home | Post | Users | Messages