Re: to be or not to be... - XCC Forum | Register | Login | Search History | Home | Messages |
to be or not to be... | flyby | 07:05 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 17:35 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 17:52 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Godwin | 18:23 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 18:29 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:07 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:10 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 19:30 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 19:32 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | ReaprZero | 20:44 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 20:59 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 21:26 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 21:44 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | Olaf van der Spek | 22:43 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | flyby | 22:51 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | will | 23:46 19-11-2001 | ||
Re: to be or not to be... | haydn | 00:33 24-11-2001 |
I'm spying on Will. I can see that he's coding some voxel
normals stuff, probably a new autonormaliser?:cool:
I daren't intrupt him, although we will be going for a
beer in a few minutes. I doubt voxels will figure in the
conversation though.....:rolleyes:
Home | Post | Users | Messages |